We are less than a year away from installing a Dem President or a MAGA Dictator for Life

This should galvanize every American to support the Dems in every election, local, state, and federal. And it should move every Christian who cares about the integrity of the gospel to weep tears of repentance for the role Christians have played in making this cult of thuggery a power in the land:

Former President Donald J. Trump declared in the first rally of his 2024 presidential campaign: “I am your retribution.” He later vowed to use the Justice Department to go after his political adversaries, starting with President Biden and his family.

Beneath these public threats is a series of plans by Mr. Trump and his allies that would upend core elements of American governance, democracy, foreign policy and the rule of law if he regained the White House.

Some of these themes trace back to the final period of Mr. Trump’s term in office. By that stage, his key advisers had learned how to more effectively wield power and Mr. Trump had fired officials who resisted some of his impulses and replaced them with loyalists. Then he lost the 2020 election and was cast out of power.

Since leaving office, Mr. Trump’s advisers and allies at a network of well-funded groups have advanced policies, created lists of potential personnel and started shaping new legal scaffolding — laying the groundwork for a second Trump presidency they hope will commence on Jan. 20, 2025.

In a vague statement, two top officials on Mr. Trump’s campaign have sought to distance his campaign team from some of the plans being developed by Mr. Trump’s outside allies, groups led by former senior Trump administration officials who remain in direct contact with him. The statement called news reports about the campaign’s personnel and policy intentions “purely speculative and theoretical.”

The plans described here generally derive from what Mr. Trump has trumpeted on the campaign trail, what has appeared on his campaign website and interviews with Trump advisers, including one who spoke with The New York Times at the request of the campaign.

If he wins another term, Mr. Trump has said he would use the Justice Department to have his adversaries investigated and charged with crimes, including saying in June that he would appoint “a real special prosecutor to go after” President Biden and his family. He later declared in an interview with Univision that he could, if someone challenged him politically, have that person indicted.

Allies of Mr. Trump have also been developing an intellectual blueprint to cast aside the post-Watergate norm of Justice Department investigatory independence from White House political direction.

Foreshadowing such a move, Mr. Trump had already violated norms in his 2016 campaign by promising to “lock up” his opponent, Hillary Clinton, over her use of a private email server. While president, he repeatedly told aides he wanted the Justice Department to indict his political enemies, including officials he had fired such as James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director. The Justice Department opened various such investigations but did not bring charges — infuriating Mr. Trump and leading to a split in 2020 with his attorney general, William P. Barr.

Mr. Trump is planning an assault on immigration on a scale unseen in modern American history. Millions of undocumented immigrants would be barred from the country or uprooted from it years or even decades after settling here.

How Times reporters cover politics. Times journalists may vote, but they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. That includes participating in rallies and donating money to a candidate or cause.

Bolstered by agents reassigned from other federal law enforcement agencies and state police and the National Guard, officials with Immigration and Customs Enforcement would carry out sweeping raids aimed at deporting millions of people each year. Military funds would be used to erect sprawling camps to hold undocumented detainees. A public-health emergency law would be invoked to shut down asylum requests by people arriving at the border. And the government would try to end birthright citizenship for babies born on U.S. soil to undocumented parents.

While in office, Mr. Trump mused about using the military to attack drug cartels in Mexico, an idea that would violate international law unless Mexico consented. That idea has since taken on broader Republican backing, and Mr. Trump intends to make the idea a reality if he returns to the Oval Office.

While the Posse Comitatus Act generally makes it illegal to use federal troops for domestic law enforcement purposes, another law called the Insurrection Act creates an exception. Mr. Trump wanted to invoke the Insurrection Act to use troops to crack down on protesters after the 2020 police killing of George Floyd, but was thwarted, and the idea remains salient among his advisers. Among other things, his top immigration adviser has said they would invoke the Insurrection Act at the southern border to use soldiers to intercept and detain undocumented migrants.

Mr. Trump and his backers want to increase presidential power over federal agencies, centralizing greater control over the entire machinery of government in the White House.

They have adopted a maximalist version of the so-called unitary executive theory, which says the president can directly command the entire federal bureaucracy and that it is unconstitutional for Congress to create pockets of independent decision-making authority.

As part of that plan, Mr. Trump also intends to revive an effort from the end of his presidency to alter civil-service rules that protect career government professionals, enabling him to fire tens of thousands of federal workers and replace them with loyalists. After Congress failed to enact legislation to block such a change, the Biden administration is developing a regulation to essentially Trump-proof the federal work force. However, since that is merely an executive action, the next Republican president could simply undo it the same way.

Politically appointed lawyers sometimes frustrated Mr. Trump’s desires by raising legal objections to his and his top advisers’ ideas. This dynamic has led to a quiet split on the right, as Trump loyalists have come to view the typical Federalist Society lawyer — essentially a mainstream Republican conservative — with disdain.

In a potential new term, Mr. Trump’s allies are planning to systematically install more aggressive and ideologically aligned legal gatekeepers who will be more likely to bless contentious actions. Mr. Trump and his 2024 campaign declined to answer a series of detailed questions about what limits, if any, he would recognize on his powers across a range of war, secrecy and law enforcement matters — many raised by his first term — in a New York Times 2024 presidential candidate survey.

When the Cult talks about the “Deep State”, what they mean is our Constitutional order with checks on the absolute power of an authoritarian tyrant. If Trump is elected, it will be our last free election and our children will curse us. And we will deserve it. That this criminal is the front runner of the GOP and not in prison is a massive indictment of our culture and an even more massive indictment of the abject failure of conservative American Christianity, Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox. That this antichrist is their savior and the Holy Father is the most hated enemy of the Greatest Catholics of All Time is a spectacular testimony to the mind-boggling depravity of so-called “Faithful Conservative Catholics”.

Share

7 Responses

  1. I really, really hope I’m wrong. But unless he is sitting in a jail cell, I think Trump is going to win the election. No one on Earth is better at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory than the US Democratic Party, and I already see signs of the Biden campaign doing exactly that.

    But “dictator for life” … might not be that long. Trump is pushing 80 himself, is not in great health, and reportedly hasn’t willingly eaten a vegetable since the mid ’90s. Unless scientists figure out how to preserve his head in a jar like on FUTURAMA, I don’t see Trump being with us all that many more years.

  2. I really, really hope I am wrong about this – but I remember saying to my wife, when Russian troops invaded Ukraine, that I wondered if we were now in 1935. Then October 7th happened and I wondered if it was now 1938. Now the US hawks are screaming at Iran. So we have the US, Russia, Iran, and Israel – four nuclear powers – positioning themselves – and then Mr Trump …

    God, have mercy! Christ, have mercy! God, have mercy!

    1. Iran is not a nuclear power. Not yet anyway.

      And for all his saber-rattling, I honestly don’t think Putin is stupid enough to approve a tactical nuclear strike on Ukraine. Prevailing winds would drench Russia in nuclear fallout. Putin is self-serving and power hungry, but he isn’t mad.

      Trump on the other hand? This is a man who once suggested we could nuke a hurricane. That would be the global equivalent of fixing a broken pipe in your house by burning the house down.

      Keep in mind as well that Trump does not have a red launch button by the pile of empty Happy Meal boxes on his desk. A first strike would entail the consultation of the Joint Chiefs and many military advisers, and I think there is still enough sanity in that room to prevent the great Orange One from doing something so colossally stupid.

      1. OK, sorry, I thought Iran was a nuclear power. But they just use it for electrical power, not bombs, is that correct?

        Anyway … it wasn’t so much the “nuclear war” bit I was thinking about – just the way, especially, if I think of it, since 2014 and Crimea, the world is seeming more and more sabre-rattling-esque. God grant the sabres do no more than rattle!

      2. Iran is not a nuclear power, but it’s damn close. What it’s done is to enrich a bunch of uranium to levels that are too low for weapons material, but high enough that enriching the rest of the way could happen very quickly. It’s thought they have enough of that to put together five weapons or so. Iran is evil, but not irrational. They know that going the rest of the way would likely provoke a war from Israel and maybe us. What they want is just enough nuclear capability to be a credible threat. The message is, don’t think about doing us the way you did Iraq or we’ll be forced to go nuclear.

        A country can achieve a lot of capability without assembling a final weapon. Iran can, and has, done a lot of ICBM development and should they go nuclear would certainly be able to reach Europe, if not us.

Leave a Reply

Follow Mark on Twitter and Facebook

Get updates by email

NEW BOOK!

Advertisement

Discover more from Stumbling Toward Heaven

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading